Sr. Web Developer
mediabistro.com
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume

Comments for: bill19990831

Message # 1011205:
Date: 05/07/02 11:07
By: Josep
Subject: Fusebox is a good idea

I've been developping in CF for 2 years and I find fusebox very useful. If you need interaction with databases it's very functional to separate the queries from de displays. Furthermore, most webs are the same in essence. If you make a module for displaying news once, you would only need to reconfigure it for make it fit the specific needs of each particular web, but the structure can be saved.
Obviously, I don't see the point on calling "webbox" and "webaction" to something that is called "fusebox" and "fuseaction" without any problem and with (more or less) general understanding.
It's absurd to think that fusebox applies only with CF and webbox relates to PHP or whatever else.

Best regards.

Previous Message | Next Message


Comments:
RE: PHP/fusebox exampleBoyNextDoor06/17/03 12:48
RE: FB3 and Templates?BoyNextDoor06/17/03 12:36
FB3 and Templates?Jonathan Griffin12/30/02 02:44
RE: Fusebox has no place with PHPCoolfires12/27/02 06:36
RE: Refresh ..! Help ...!!!Jason05/08/02 20:11
Tutorial HereRod05/07/02 12:10
Fusebox is a good ideaJosep05/07/02 11:07
PHP/fusebox examplekace05/04/02 08:49
RE: PHP is short for? Bill Gates02/27/02 08:01
PHP in multi tier architectureSrinivas12/05/01 02:29
Defaults?Bryan11/28/01 17:05
RE: Fusebox has no place with PHPAntonio Mokarzel11/26/01 11:36
RE: Why not OO?Dan Tansanu10/24/01 00:14
Any FULL examplesEddie10/19/01 12:02
RE: Why not OO?piero09/22/01 03:24
Why not OO?Karim09/18/01 12:19
RE: Fusebox has no place with PHPRicardo09/10/01 11:35
RE: Fusebox has no place with PHPFrank Uplands07/23/01 20:11
Refresh ..! Help ...!!!Ashraf Baroudi07/03/01 23:18
RE: PHP is short for? VNCoder06/28/01 18:30
RE: PHP is short for? Mark S.06/28/01 15:58
RE: PHP is short for? Larry Ullman06/19/01 12:36
RE: PHP is short for? Jon Adams06/18/01 11:39
RE: PHP is short for? Oktay Altunergil06/07/01 16:58
Other modelEldes de Paula05/14/01 12:36
RE: PHP is short for? freakysid05/13/01 21:13
RE: Fusebox has no place with PHPTim Lieberman05/13/01 11:29
Fusebox has no place with PHPTobyWong05/11/01 10:22
RE: PHP is short for? Richard05/07/01 22:46
PHP is short for? Aisha04/26/01 03:43
RE: Do we need more words?John Farrar04/17/01 15:48
RE: Whats so special about Fusebox?John Farrar04/17/01 15:44
RE: Do we need more words?David Martinez04/09/01 13:16
RE: PHP-FuseBox newsgroup (egroup)rITESH03/11/01 06:55
RE: fusebox?Steven02/09/01 10:55
RE: Whats so special about Fusebox?Gordon Goldner02/06/01 12:25
PHP-FuseBox newsgroup (egroup)Rene Nederhand01/31/01 08:16
mSQL-PHP3 (miniSQL)Christian Vizcarra Guerrero01/27/01 01:33
Do we need more words?Scott01/10/01 09:19
RE: optimized version of function based fuseboxBen01/05/01 12:35
Whats so special about Fusebox?Ben01/05/01 12:33
RE: Some thoughtsBaruch Even01/04/01 05:23
optimized version of function based fuseboxPaul Meagher12/15/00 11:44
Example of function based fuseboxPaul Meagher12/15/00 11:00
RE: fusebox?Steve Beuret11/29/00 08:32
Why a gateway classSteve Beuret11/28/00 09:56
fusebox?Terence11/27/00 23:40
RE: includes vs. functionsFaSer11/10/00 06:48
includes vs. functionsSteve Nelson11/09/00 14:12
RE: Advantages over function includesSteve Nelson11/09/00 13:58
Advantages over function includesJacob Hanson11/08/00 13:58
Sessions In PHP/FuseboxBill Holloway08/19/00 12:19
RE: Some thoughtsBill Holloway08/19/00 12:02
Some thoughtsIlja Heitlager08/14/00 18:32
 

If you are looking for help, please post on the appropriate forum here. Your questions will be answered much more quickly.

Add A Comment:

Name:

Email:

Subject:

Message:

To reduce spam posts, messages are now manually approved

You are not [logged in]. That means your account will not get credit for this post.