|
Comments for: bill19990831
| Message # 1011171: |
|
Date: 05/04/02 08:49
By: kace Subject: PHP/fusebox example The idea of Fusebox is a great one, as it provides a good framework for organizing codes, especially those that binds together a lot of unrelated modules, like a content management system or a groupware portal. I just learned about Fusebox for php one week ago and have been trying to convert some of my portal project to it. I think if all the php-groupware module writers adopt fusebox, we will get closer to the concept of plug and play. Instead of 100 different portal systems, we can just create a few really full-featured ones. I'm still having problems because there is so little sample or tutorial info. Hopefully someone will write a full tutorial with a nontrivial demo program. |
Previous Message | Next Message |
| Comments: | ||
| RE: PHP/fusebox example | BoyNextDoor | 06/17/03 12:48 |
| RE: FB3 and Templates? | BoyNextDoor | 06/17/03 12:36 |
| FB3 and Templates? | Jonathan Griffin | 12/30/02 02:44 |
| RE: Fusebox has no place with PHP | Coolfires | 12/27/02 06:36 |
| RE: Refresh ..! Help ...!!! | Jason | 05/08/02 20:11 |
| Tutorial Here | Rod | 05/07/02 12:10 |
| Fusebox is a good idea | Josep | 05/07/02 11:07 |
| PHP/fusebox example | kace | 05/04/02 08:49 |
| RE: PHP is short for? | Bill Gates | 02/27/02 08:01 |
| PHP in multi tier architecture | Srinivas | 12/05/01 02:29 |
| Defaults? | Bryan | 11/28/01 17:05 |
| RE: Fusebox has no place with PHP | Antonio Mokarzel | 11/26/01 11:36 |
| RE: Why not OO? | Dan Tansanu | 10/24/01 00:14 |
| Any FULL examples | Eddie | 10/19/01 12:02 |
| RE: Why not OO? | piero | 09/22/01 03:24 |
| Why not OO? | Karim | 09/18/01 12:19 |
| RE: Fusebox has no place with PHP | Ricardo | 09/10/01 11:35 |
| RE: Fusebox has no place with PHP | Frank Uplands | 07/23/01 20:11 |
| Refresh ..! Help ...!!! | Ashraf Baroudi | 07/03/01 23:18 |
| RE: PHP is short for? | VNCoder | 06/28/01 18:30 |
| RE: PHP is short for? | Mark S. | 06/28/01 15:58 |
| RE: PHP is short for? | Larry Ullman | 06/19/01 12:36 |
| RE: PHP is short for? | Jon Adams | 06/18/01 11:39 |
| RE: PHP is short for? | Oktay Altunergil | 06/07/01 16:58 |
| Other model | Eldes de Paula | 05/14/01 12:36 |
| RE: PHP is short for? | freakysid | 05/13/01 21:13 |
| RE: Fusebox has no place with PHP | Tim Lieberman | 05/13/01 11:29 |
| Fusebox has no place with PHP | TobyWong | 05/11/01 10:22 |
| RE: PHP is short for? | Richard | 05/07/01 22:46 |
| PHP is short for? | Aisha | 04/26/01 03:43 |
| RE: Do we need more words? | John Farrar | 04/17/01 15:48 |
| RE: Whats so special about Fusebox? | John Farrar | 04/17/01 15:44 |
| RE: Do we need more words? | David Martinez | 04/09/01 13:16 |
| RE: PHP-FuseBox newsgroup (egroup) | rITESH | 03/11/01 06:55 |
| RE: fusebox? | Steven | 02/09/01 10:55 |
| RE: Whats so special about Fusebox? | Gordon Goldner | 02/06/01 12:25 |
| PHP-FuseBox newsgroup (egroup) | Rene Nederhand | 01/31/01 08:16 |
| mSQL-PHP3 (miniSQL) | Christian Vizcarra Guerrero | 01/27/01 01:33 |
| Do we need more words? | Scott | 01/10/01 09:19 |
| RE: optimized version of function based fusebox | Ben | 01/05/01 12:35 |
| Whats so special about Fusebox? | Ben | 01/05/01 12:33 |
| RE: Some thoughts | Baruch Even | 01/04/01 05:23 |
| optimized version of function based fusebox | Paul Meagher | 12/15/00 11:44 |
| Example of function based fusebox | Paul Meagher | 12/15/00 11:00 |
| RE: fusebox? | Steve Beuret | 11/29/00 08:32 |
| Why a gateway class | Steve Beuret | 11/28/00 09:56 |
| fusebox? | Terence | 11/27/00 23:40 |
| RE: includes vs. functions | FaSer | 11/10/00 06:48 |
| includes vs. functions | Steve Nelson | 11/09/00 14:12 |
| RE: Advantages over function includes | Steve Nelson | 11/09/00 13:58 |
| Advantages over function includes | Jacob Hanson | 11/08/00 13:58 |
| Sessions In PHP/Fusebox | Bill Holloway | 08/19/00 12:19 |
| RE: Some thoughts | Bill Holloway | 08/19/00 12:02 |
| Some thoughts | Ilja Heitlager | 08/14/00 18:32 |
|
If you are looking for help, please post on the appropriate forum here. Your questions will be answered much more quickly. | ||


