Sr. Web Developer
mediabistro.com
US-NY-New York

Justtechjobs.com Post A Job | Post A Resume

Comments for: argerich20010125

Message # 1009203:
Date: 01/20/02 17:33
By: Matt
Subject: Garbage displayed

Does anyone know why when I try this script it produces garbage on my screen? Something like ‹xÚ³ññõ±³qòw‰´óTÏUHÎÏ-(J-.NMÑQÈ/RHÌUðT´ÑKÛèƒÕr«Ê¢ã3

Thanks,

Matt

Previous Message | Next Message


Comments:
Check this firstEdemilson Lima08/20/03 02:03
How to test the effect?Gopi11/26/02 08:07
include_once much faster than readfileAnthony Topper08/02/02 10:32
ob_gzhandler returns nothing!AtLAnTiS07/19/02 03:57
RE: Garbage displayedParker07/01/02 14:52
RE: Garbage displayedtobias deutsch06/28/02 10:02
RE: will google (and others) crawl gzip content?Hannes Schmiderer04/20/02 04:19
will google (and others) crawl gzip content?Benjamin Kuz04/15/02 05:20
Garbage displayedMatt01/20/02 17:33
script changesredHairedBitch12/20/01 08:29
Output buffering not workingJonathan09/05/01 21:20
RE: Compression: true or false??Gossip08/17/01 06:19
RE: why compress when its already compressed?terry chay08/02/01 18:32
RE: Problems with session IDterry chay08/02/01 18:20
RE: much easier solutionterry chay08/02/01 18:15
RE: Compression: true or false??terry chay08/02/01 18:08
RE: Compression: true or false??Colin07/06/01 16:15
RE: win32Daniel Gustafsson06/30/01 11:28
RE: Chill OutJeff C06/02/01 13:07
RE: much easier solutionJeff C06/02/01 09:36
Compression: true or false??Barefoot05/30/01 04:48
RE: why compress when its already compressed?Monte Ohrt05/08/01 11:12
RE: win32Mark Walker05/03/01 13:20
RE: why compress when its already compressed?Mark Walker05/03/01 13:18
RE: Fred - How to test the effect ?Sonny Savage05/02/01 13:11
RE: why compress when its already compressed?DB765432103/18/01 23:13
RE: How to test the effect ?Fred03/12/01 14:13
Server limitations....Eric Nielsen03/08/01 15:17
Chill OutKevin J. Menard, Jr.03/08/01 13:10
much easier solutionLordBlink03/07/01 13:33
RE: Ignore last message / ob_gzhandler fix in CVSJason02/28/01 08:01
RE: Ignore last message / ob_gzhandler fix in CVSJason02/28/01 07:54
RE: Ignore last message / ob_gzhandler fix in CVSJason02/28/01 07:41
Problems with session IDAndrew02/28/01 07:10
why compress when its already compressed?Thamir Ghaslaan02/25/01 19:29
RE: mod_gzip 1.3.17aMichael Douma02/22/01 17:56
Class for this type of cachingChristian Stocker02/22/01 03:36
RE: mod_gzip 1.3.17aDB765432102/19/01 12:27
mod_gzip 1.3.17aTim Frank02/16/01 20:15
Ignore last message / ob_gzhandler fix in CVSTim Kask02/09/01 02:32
RE: Strange Effect: Takes entire server downTim Kask02/09/01 01:46
RE: Where to install Zlib?Rik Bradt02/08/01 03:09
Need help determine compression gainWill02/07/01 09:13
RE: How to test the effect ?terry chay02/07/01 07:06
Important noteLuis Argerich02/07/01 06:31
RE: win32Will02/06/01 03:44
RE: How to test the effect ?Will02/06/01 03:42
win32Kreft02/04/01 19:10
How to test the effect ?Alain Fontaine02/04/01 04:47
RE: This works much better ...Tim Frank02/02/01 21:51
PHP4 snapshot (2/1/01) appears okayDerek Piper02/02/01 14:42
This works much better ...Sebastian Benner02/02/01 04:33
RE: Mod_Gzipcolin02/01/01 12:25
RE: Strange Effect: Takes entire server downTim Perdue, PHPBuilder.com02/01/01 09:24
Where to install Zlib?Will02/01/01 08:46
Mod_GzipManu02/01/01 05:00
RE: Isn't this supported by the latest Mod Gzip?UnKn0wN01/31/01 15:17
RE: Browsers?terry chay01/31/01 10:55
RE: Why? it's better and easy to use apcterry chay01/31/01 10:31
PHP ob_gzhandler memory leakDerek Piper01/31/01 08:46
problems with built-in output compressingHenning Peters01/31/01 06:52
Very good class with _VARIABLE_ compression.Will01/30/01 07:23
RE: Browsers?Will01/30/01 07:18
Cool IE 5 behaviourAndrew Coldham01/30/01 03:01
RE: The zend solution did not work for me.Andrew Coldham01/30/01 02:49
Strange Effect: Takes entire server downTom Anderson01/30/01 01:42
Problem with Windows 98 & IE 5?Justin 01/29/01 21:45
The zend solution did not work for me.Eric Naujock01/29/01 18:21
Ignore my questionChris01/29/01 16:12
RE: Much better solution here :Chris01/29/01 16:11
Browsers?Philip Hofstetter01/29/01 12:01
RE: Isn't this supported by the latest Mod Gzip?Ivan01/29/01 09:57
Why? it's better and easy to use apcmiker01/29/01 06:07
Any strange effects with this?terry chay01/28/01 07:14
Output Buffering, from the source.Andrew Coldham01/27/01 21:02
Incredible!Jeff01/27/01 11:42
RE: HeadersDraxx01/27/01 08:51
HeadersJeff01/26/01 15:58
Nice idea, but Debian users bewareMathew Binkley01/26/01 11:42
RE: Sourceforge (Much better solution here)UnKn0wN01/26/01 11:25
RE: Sourceforge (Much better solution here)Tim Perdue, PHPBuilder.com01/26/01 10:04
RE: Much better solution here :Tim Perdue, PHPBuilder.com01/26/01 10:03
RE: Much better solution here :Derek Piper01/26/01 09:53
A complete cache validator is uploadedRicardo Galli01/26/01 05:50
RE: Much better solution here :Romain01/26/01 03:32
RE: Sourceforge (Much better solution here)Jonathan Ragan-Kelley01/25/01 20:41
RE: Much better solution here :Tom Anderson01/25/01 18:54
RE: Much better solution here :Luis Argerich01/25/01 17:38
RE: Much better solution here :Tim Perdue, PHPBuilder.com01/25/01 15:53
RE: Isn't this supported by the latest Mod Gzip?Derek Piper01/25/01 15:36
RE: Does this use up a lot of the server's power?Betcour01/25/01 11:03
Some new things....Luis Argerich01/25/01 08:30
RE: Isn't this supported by the latest Mod Gzip?Will01/25/01 08:14
way too much code!!!w00kie01/25/01 06:29
Does this use up a lot of the server's power?Björn Brändewall01/25/01 05:02
Much better solution here :Betcour01/25/01 04:20
Russian Apache and mod_gzipCyrill Malevanov01/25/01 03:54
cgi_buffer does this too, with e-tagsSteve Warwick01/25/01 03:36
RE: Isn't this supported by the latest Mod Gzip?Draxx01/25/01 03:30
Isn't this supported by the latest Mod Gzip?Matthew Villa01/24/01 23:15
a complete caching system for phpnathan01/24/01 22:58
 

If you are looking for help, please post on the appropriate forum here. Your questions will be answered much more quickly.

Add A Comment:

Name:

Email:

Subject:

Message:

To reduce spam posts, messages are now manually approved

You are not [logged in]. That means your account will not get credit for this post.